Main page content

Climate Security Challenges in Pacific Island Countries

Pacific Island Countries (PICs) face some of the world’s most profound climate-related security risks. Rather than a single conflict episode, the Pacific region experiences cascading and interconnected pathways through which climate impacts undermine human security, stress livelihoods and economies, strain governance systems, exacerbate social tensions, and threaten territorial integrity. Climate change is already altering land usability, water and food security, mobility dynamics, disaster burdens, and geopolitical stability, with rising sea levels posing existential challenges to several states.
These pressures do not currently manifest as high-intensity violent conflict across the region. However, they are generating fragility, localised tensions, and risks of instability, particularly where land scarcity, economic shocks, or disaster impacts intersect with inequality, urbanisation, and weakening traditional norms. This case study draws on the climate–fragility risk pathway framework developed in the CSEN Climate-Fragility Brief: Pacific Islands Region (Pasisi et al., 2019).

Conceptual Model

Climate ChangeEnvironmental ChangeIntermediary MechanismsFragility and Conflict RisksSea-level rise reduces available land.Sea level rise leads to salinization of coastal aquifers.Ocean acidification leads to declining fish stocks. Extreme weather event is consistent with predictions regarding more frequent and/or intense extreme weather events.Sea level rise alters natural boundaries.Sea level rise reduces available natural resources.More frequent/intense extreme weather events lead to decreased water availability.More frequent/intense extreme weather events reduce available land.More frequent/intense extreme weather events reduce available natural resources.More frequent/intense extreme weather events aggravate pollution and environmental degradation.Changing climate leads to decreased water availability.Changing climate reduces available natural resources.Ocean acidification leads to declining fish stocks. Change in natural boundaries leads to border dispute.Change in natural boundaries increases opportunities to challenge the authority of the state.Decline in fish stocks endangers the livelihoods of fishermen.Fish becomes scarce as an essential resource. Land scarcity undermines the livelihoods of agricultural producers.Land scarcity hampers agricultural production.Water scarcity undermines water-dependent livelihoods.Reduced availability of water leads to health risks.Reduced availability of water incites migration.Extreme weather event leads to displacements.Extreme weather event destroys/threatens livelihoods.Extreme weather event reveals a lacking capacity of the state to manage crises and/or reduces state capacity.Extreme weather event creates public health risks.Reduced availability of/access to natural resources undermines resource-dependent livelihoodsReduced availability of/access to natural resources reduces available resources and ecosystem services.Changes in land use lead to migration/displacements.Changes in land use reduce available/usable land.Reduced availability of/access to natural resources undermines state capacity.Reduced availability of/access to natural resources leads to volatile food prices.State elites strategically use resource scarcity for political advantage/power.Loss of livelihoods leads to migration.Livelihood insecurity reveals lacking capacity of the state to manage crises.State elites strategically use livelihood insecurity for political advantage/power.Livelihood insecurity fuels grievances between groups.Livelihood insecurity augments the risk of crime, violence, and extremism.The perceived inadequacy of state capacity leads to growing discontent with the state.Use of resource, livelihood, and health pressures for political advantage/power intensifies interstate tensions.Border dispute leads to inter-state tensions.Migration leads to conflicts between migrants and residents.Problems related to migration/displacements lead to growing discontent with the state.Migration/displacements provokes interstate tensions.Reduced capacity and/or legitimacy of the state compounds fragility.Reduced capacity and/or legitimacy of the state leads to interstate tensions.Food price volatility provokes growing discontent with the state.Public health risks cause growing discontent with the state.A rise of sea-level and the related coastal degradation and change of land and territory.Sea Level RiseReduced, availability of/ access to land.Increased Land ScarcityThe acidification of oceans through increased uptake of carbon dioxide.Ocean AcidificationA decline in fish populations.An increase in the frequency and/or intensity of extreme weather events, such as floods or droughts.More Frequent / Intense Extreme Weather EventsA specific extreme weather event such as a flood or a storm.Extreme Weather EventAltered Natural BoundariesPollution, and degradation of ecosystems, such as coral reefs.Pollution / Environmental DegradationA slow change in climatic conditions, particularly temperature and precipitation.Gradual Change in Temperature and/or PrecipitationDispute over the (re)definition of administrative boundariesBorder DisputeReduced capacity of the state to fulfil basic functions deemed necessary by the population and/or reduced public support for state authorities.Reduced State Capacity and/or LegitimacyA threat or destruction of livelihoods dependent on the availability of environmental resources / goods.Livelihood InsecurityReduced availability of essential natural resources, such as land and water.Change in Access / Availability of Natural ResourcesRisks to the health of the population.Public Health Risks(In)voluntary long and short-term movements of people within or across state boundaries.Displacements / MigrationA change in the usage of environmentally relevant land.Land Use ChangeStrong fluctuations in the prices of foodstuffs, such as cereals or livestock.Volatile Food PricesUse of resource, livelihood, and health pressures for political advantage/power.PoliticisationNon-violent or violent tensions and conflicts between different societal groups.Grievances between Societal GroupsThe uptake of activities, such as joining extremist groups or engaging in illicit and violent activities, which increase the overall fragility of a region.Crime / Violence / ExtremismChallenge to the state's legitimacy, ranging from peaceful protest to violent attempts at overthrowing the government.Anti-State GrievancesTensions between states that may but need not escalate into overt violent conflict.Interstate TensionsA reduced ability of the state to fulfil basic functions.Weakened State

History

The Emergence of Climate Security Risks in the Pacific 

Pacific Island Countries (PICs) have long faced structural vulnerabilities shaped by colonial legacies, geographic remoteness, limited land area, and narrow economic bases. Climate change has significantly amplified these challenges, increasingly posing existential risks for some Pacific Island societies (Pasisi, 2019). Sea-level rise, warming temperatures, ocean acidification, and increasingly extreme weather events have accelerated since the mid-20th century, with many impacts occurring faster in the Pacific than global averages, despite the region's minimal contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions (McMurray et al., 2023).These trends are already reshaping livelihoods, ecosystems, and critical sectors such as fisheries, agriculture, and water systems, with cascading implications for mobility, governance, and social cohesion across the region (Pasisi, 2019).

From the 1990s onward, Pacific states emerged as early global advocates linking climate change to survival, sovereignty, and human security, embedding these concerns within regional frameworks emphasising human-centred and non-traditional security. This evolution was formalised in the Boe Declaration on Regional Security (2018) and its subsequent Action Plan (2019), which identified climate change as the region’s most severe security threat, with implications for governance, livelihoods, identity, and stability. This recognition reflects decades of evolving understanding that climate impacts extend beyond environmental degradation, constituting multidimensional risks shaping the social, economic, and political fabric of Pacific societies (Shibata et al., 2024).

 

Climate Impacts Create Multi-Layered Pressures 


Climate Change threatens livelihoods and the blue economy

Climate change is undermining Pacific livelihoods by damaging the ecological and economic systems that sustain fisheries, tourism and coastal economies. Rising ocean temperatures, marine heat stress and ocean acidification are accelerating coral bleaching and degrading reef ecosystems, while cyclones such as Pam (2015), Winston (2016) and Harold (2020) have caused extensive destruction to coastal assets (Barry et al., 2025). Changing ocean conditions are also disrupting fish stocks, with warming waters projected to push commercially important species out of Pacific Exclusive Economic Zones, reducing fisheries revenues that governments depend on for fiscal stability and service provision (McMurray et al., 2023; Palacios-Abrantes et al., 2021). At the same time, coral loss and coastal degradation are weakening nearshore fisheries, undermining food security and household income, particularly in subsistence and outer-island communities (McMurray et al., 2023). Because a significant share of Pacific livelihoods is concentrated in climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture, tourism, and fisheries, both households and national economies remain highly exposed to climate shocks (Pasisi, 2019). As coping capacity erodes, these pressures contribute to rising unemployment, increased reliance on imported food and, in some cases, maladaptive coping strategies further undermining community resilience and increasing downstream risks of displacement and social instability (Steinkraus et al., 2024; Rüttinger & Khèdr, 2025).

 

Climate Stress Weakens Food, Water and Health Security 

Climate change is increasingly undermining access to safe water, adequate food and basic health services across Pacific Island Countries. Rising temperatures, altered rainfall patterns, droughts, flooding and saltwater intrusion are degrading freshwater resources, reducing agricultural productivity and disrupting coastal and nearshore fisheries that underpin local food security (McMurray et al., 2023; SPC, 2015). In low-lying atoll states, contamination of freshwater lenses is forcing greater reliance on rainwater harvesting, desalination and external assistance, heightening risks of water scarcity and placing additional strain on already limited health and service delivery systems, particularly following extreme events (Shibata et al., 2024). At the same time, climate impacts are reducing access to traditional, nutritious foods while increasing dependence on imported, low-nutrient alternatives, compounding public health challenges such as high rates of non-communicable diseases. As extreme heat, flooding and ecological change expand the spread of vector- and water-borne diseases (Pasisi, 2019). Over time, declining health, food and water security erode human capital and social resilience, acting as a threat multiplier that amplifies risks linked to livelihood loss, displacement and state fragility.

 

Disasters Exacerbate Vulnerabilities and Strain State Capacity

More frequent and intense disasters, particularly cyclones, droughts, storm surges and flooding, are increasingly overwhelming state capacities across the Pacific. Tropical cyclone intensity has risen in recent decades and is expected to worsen as ocean temperatures continue to increase (Kuleshov et al., 2014; Deo et al., 2022). Storm surges, king tides and flooding damage infrastructure, contaminate freshwater lenses and undermine agricultural land, while droughts associated with stronger El Niño cycles further disrupt water supplies and undermine livelihoods. These impacts generate significant economic shocks: climate-related disasters already cause an estimated USD 1.075 billion in annual losses, around 5% of Pacific SIDS’ GDP, placing sustained pressure on public finances and recovery systems (McMurray et al., 2023). Repeated disasters strain governments’ ability to deliver essential services, erode public trust, and widen inequalities when recovery is uneven. In some contexts, post-disaster periods are associated with increased opportunistic crime, social disorder, and pressure on policing and emergency services, particularly where response capacity is limited (Pasisi, 2019). Poorly designed or inequitable recovery efforts can further weaken social cohesion and reinforce existing vulnerabilities and grievances, increasing longer-term risks of fragility (Barry et al., 2025; Shibata et al., 2024).

 

Climate Change Shapes Mobility Trends and Heightens Displacement Risks

Environmental degradation, disasters and declining livelihood opportunities are accelerating mobility primarily within Pacific Island Countries, and to a more limited extent between islands and states (Pasisi, 2019;). In many cases, climate impacts undermine land habitability long before physical inundation occurs, as saltwater intrusion, erosion, and water scarcity reduce the viability of settlements and livelihoods. These pressures drive growing movement from outer islands to urban centres, as well as seasonal and distress migration, placing strain on housing, services, and labour markets and increasing risks of social tension (Pasisi, 2019; Barry et al., 2025;). Mobility also carries cultural and psychological consequences, as the loss of ancestral land and associated ecosystems threatens identity and community cohesion, particularly for atoll populations facing the prospect of long-term relocation (Shibata, et al., 2024). At the same time, mobility is uneven: financial, educational, health, and social constraints limit the ability of some individuals and communities to move. Where relocation occurs, outcomes are strongly shaped by customary land tenure systems, which regulate access to land through traditional authority structures. Without sustained dialogue and inclusive planning, relocation processes, particularly where land is scarce, may generate disputes and heighten the risk of social tension, with disproportionate impacts on vulnerable groups (Pasisi, 2019).

 

Climate Change Spurs Sovereignty, Maritime Boundary, and Geostrategic Concerns

Climate change intersects with sovereignty and geopolitics in ways that pose significant security risks for Pacific Island Countries. Sea-level rise threatens the physical baselines used to determine maritime zones, creating legal uncertainty around Exclusive Economic Zones that are central to governance, law enforcement, and natural resource management (McMurray et al., 2023). At the extreme, climate change raises existential concerns for low-lying atoll nations, as large-scale land loss challenges territorial integrity and long-term state continuity. As maritime features are altered or inundated, the long-term security of marine resource rights and the exercise of state authority over ocean spaces may be weakened (ILA, 2018; SPC, 2019). At the same time, climate-related pressures, such as weakened domestic capacity, economic vulnerability and expanding adaptation needs, interact with intensifying strategic competition among external powers. As maritime resources, ocean governance, and climate finance become increasingly politicised, Pacific Island Countries face heightened risks of geostrategic contestation and external influence (Paskal, 2010; Barry et al, 2025). Together, these dynamics may reduce effective control over marine resources and complicate long-term efforts to safeguard sovereignty, maritime rights, and regional stability.

Entry Points for Strengthening Stability

Climate resilience strategies address climate-fragility risks by strengthening the capacity of societies to manage climate impacts and associated stresses. The Weathering Risk Report Climate, Peace and Environmental Resilience in the Asia-Pacific Region (2025) identifies key entry points for intervention, focusing on reducing pressures linked to mobility, strengthening regional and international cooperation, and expanding local capacities to cope with accelerating climate risks.

  1. Strengthen resilience for migrants and staying communities. Support community-based disaster risk management, early warning systems and rural livelihood investments to reduce forced displacement. Recognise mobility as a legitimate adaptation strategy and design relocation and migration policies in close consultation with affected communities, including IDPs, youth, host communities and non-migrants
  2. Improve governance of climate-related mobility. Develop transparent, inclusive processes for planned relocation and internal migration, addressing land tenure challenges and host-community relations. Draw on lessons from the Australia–Tuvalu Falepili Union and community-led initiatives such as the Carteret Islands programme.
  3. Platform Pacific voices in regional and global institutions. Strengthen the role of the Pacific Islands Forum in UN bodies and other international fora. Ensure consistent technical and financial support for Pacific participation in climate–peace diplomacy and facilitate regular engagement with civil society to align global policy with community needs. 
  4. Build local and regional climate-security capacities. Expand context-specific research and regularly update climate-security assessments at district and community levels. Support workshops, training and community-led adaptation initiatives that centre local knowledge and inclusive participation across gender, class and ethnicity. 

Resilience and Peace Building

4

Cooperation

Regional cooperation is one of the strongest sources of resilience in the Pacific. The Pacific Islands Forum provides a unified platform for joint climate advocacy, shared assessments, and coordinated security approaches, as reflected in the Boe Declaration and the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent. PICs also advocate collectively at the international level, amplifying the region's influence and elevating climate change as a core security concern in global debates. Securing adequate and predictable funding and technical support to translate regional commitments into national budgets and programmes remains a persistent gap. Geopolitical competition in the region also risks diverting political attention away from climate priorities.

3

Improving infrastructure & services

Investments in water systems, coastal protection, and early warning systems are expanding but remain insufficient. Adaptation costs for coastal protection alone are projected to reach USD 285 million per year by 2040, far exceeding national fiscal capacities (Pasisi, 2019). Repeated cyclones and floods continue to cause major fiscal shocks, leaving many communities structurally unprotected (McMurray et al., 2023).

2

Promoting alternative livelihoods

Diversification through sustainable fisheries, eco-tourism, and small enterprises is emerging but limited. High unemployment, reliance on climate-sensitive sectors (agriculture, fisheries, tourism), and structural economic constraints hinder diversification (Barry et al., 2025). Approximately 75% of Pacific Islanders' incomes are likely to be adversely affected by climate change, with subsistence economies particularly exposed. Structural barriers, including land tenure insecurity, limited finance access, and lack of community co-design, constrain uptake of diversified livelihoods (McMurray et al., 2023).

3

Improving actionable information

Climate information services, early warning systems, and risk assessments are improving through regional agencies and partners. However, gaps persist in translating this information into accessible, locally relevant, and actionable forms, limiting its effectiveness for community-level preparedness, mobility planning, and decision-making (McMurray et al., 2023).

3

Treaty/agreement

Innovative approaches are being pursued, including maritime boundary fixing, digital citizenship (Tuvalu), and ICJ advisory opinion engagement. The Australia-Tuvalu Falepili Union (2024) is a landmark example, establishing migration pathways while preserving Tuvaluan statehood. However, existing international legal frameworks (including UNCLOS) were not designed for disappearing states, and implementation pathways for sea-level rise driven sovereignty challenges remain legally and politically incomplete (Pasisi, 2019; McMurray et al., 2023).

2

Social inclusion & empowerment

Strong indigenous governance systems and community networks underpin local resilience. However, support for inclusive adaptation and co-designed planned relocation is severely limited. For Pacific communities, land loss carries profound non-material dimensions, tied to identity, kinship, and spirituality, meaning poorly managed relocation risks social fragmentation, psychological harm, and conflict with host communities (Shibata et al., 2024; McMurray et al., 2023).

Resources and Materials