Main page content

Conflict between Habaniya and Reizegat Baggara in Sudan

Violent clashes between Habaniya and Reizegat Baggara pastoralists in 2006 are one of many communal conflicts originating from diminishing land and water resources in Darfur.

Conceptual Model

Climate ChangeEnvironmental ChangeFragility and Conflict RisksIntermediary MechanismsMore frequent/intense extreme weather events reduce available natural resources.Changes in land use reduce available/usable natural resources.Reduced availability of/access to natural resources reduces available resources and ecosystem services.Reduced availability of/access to natural resources induces migration.Migration leads to conflicts between migrants and residents.An increase in the frequency and/or intensity of extreme weather events, such as floods or droughts.More Frequent / Intense Extreme Weather EventsGrowing, scarcity of essential natural resources.Natural Resource ScarcityA, change in the usage of environmentally relevant land.Land Use ChangeReduced availability of essential natural resources, such as land and water.Change in Access / Availability of Natural Resources(In)voluntary long and short-term movements of people within or across state boundaries.Displacements / MigrationNon-violent or violent tensions and conflicts between different societal groups.Grievances between Societal Groups

Conflict history

In July 2006, a dispute over grazing land led to several violent clashes between Habaniya and Reizegat Baggara pastoralists, resulting in more than 150 deaths (UCDP 2015). Environmentally induced migration from northern pastoralists groups into south Darfur is believed to be an important reason behind this violence. Spreading desertification and severe droughts during the 1980s, have forced a large number of northern Darfurians to move to the southern part of the region.

The influx of pastoralist groups in the south has not only provoked disputes between newcomers and resident groups, but also heavily constrained overall access to pastures, thus increasing resource competition between southern groups such as the Habaniya and Reizegat Baggara. The gradual expansion of agriculture in southern Darfur has further aggravated this situation (Takana 2007; American University 2006).

A further important factor exacerbating these conflicts was the abolishment of the Native Administration system in 1971. In the past the Native Administration managed local land and grazing rights in accordance with customary institutions and helped avoiding conflicts between farmers and herders, as well as between migrants from northern Darfur and local communities in southern Darfur. Because the Sudanese Government presented no viable alternative, the abolishment of this system led to an institutional vacuum, crippling much of the functionality of customary land tenure and conflict mitigation institutions. The Government of Sudan also increasingly managed crises by supporting armed militia groups, thereby aggravating conflicts that could have been resolved in a peaceful manner (de Waal 2007; Unruh & Abdul-Jalil 2012).

Actors

Actor
Participation
Functional group
Geographical scale
Habaniya community
Habaniya community
Participation
Functional group
Civil Society
Geographical scale
Internal grassroots
Reizegat Baggara community
Reizegat Baggara community
Participation
Functional group
Civil Society
Geographical scale
Internal grassroots
Local administration (Darfur, Sudan)
Local administration (Darfur, Sudan)
Participation
Functional group
Public
Geographical scale
Internal national
Conflict Party
Conflict Resolution Facilitator

Conflict resolution

In 2006 the dispute between Habaniya and Reizegat Baggara was solved when the local administration organised a reconciliation conference. There, both parties signed a reconciliation document. Since then no more clashes have been reported (UCDP 2015; ACLED, 2014; CrisisWatch, 2014).